PDA

View Full Version : touchy feely.


Billyman
01-08-2004, 01:26 AM
I'd do the same. (http://http://www.gainesvillesun.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20040107/LOCAL/40107005/1007)

A Gainesville man was arrested Tuesday morning after authorities said he used an ax handle to beat up a convicted sexual offender who authorities said touched his son.

Roosevelt Henry Reed, 29, just moved into a halfway house at 1580 SE 33rd St. on Monday, Alachua County Sheriff's Lt. Jim Troiano said. Reed got out of prison in July after serving a five-year sentence for lewd and lascivious acts on a child under 16, according to Department of Corrections records.

An 11-year-old boy was staying at the halfway house, which is owned and operated by the boy's relatives.

The boy woke up at about 2 a.m. Tuesday to find a man rubbing his stomach and leg, Troiano said. He screamed and another man sleeping in the room woke up and yelled at the man, who fled. Relatives called the boy's father, who found Reed walking in the 2300 block of Hawthorne Road. The man hit Reed several times with an ax handle.

Reed was treated by paramedics and then arrested on charges of battery and burglary.

The boy's father, whose name The Sun is withholding to protect the identity of the victim, was arrested on charges of aggravated battery.

Troiano said that while the father's feelings are understandable, authorities can't allow that kind of vengeance.

Reed won't be allowed to return to the halfway house or to go anywhere near the boy, Troiano said. And while some sexual offenders aren't allowed near children, Reed had no such prohibition, Troiano said. Reed has served two prison sentences for lewd and lascivious acts on children.
______________________________________________________

Troiano said that while the father's feelings are understandable, authorities can't allow that kind of vengeance.

But why not? Because the system is working so well to prevent this from happening again and yet to another child?

Goddamn.

MAC
01-08-2004, 02:53 AM
modern justice is aligned to protect the possibly innocent and incarcerate the possibly guilty

in a perfect world the cops would have had to carry off the dead body of a repeat sex offender and no witnesses would have come forth to say who did it.

Uberwonder
01-08-2004, 02:53 AM
It was aggravated battery after all.
$12 fine and confiscate the axe handle.

That's fair.

Mudflap
01-08-2004, 03:38 AM
Just a thought.

If the father loves his son so much, why does his son live in a half-way-house with "relatives"?

Venus
01-08-2004, 04:06 AM
Last I checked a half-way house isn't an adoption agency muddy. It's not someplace you send your kids when you tire of them. If the kid had done something bad or not doesn't mean the father doesn't love him.

And here I thought this thread was be about how much Billy wants to touch and feel me...

Billyman
01-08-2004, 04:20 AM
It just said "staying" Mud. I assume since it was relatives, maybe a night or weekend thing? Dunno.

MAC
01-08-2004, 03:06 PM
fact of life:

we all have fucked up individuals in our extended families.
we all have good-natured members of our families who let terrible ppl into their lives for whatever fucked up reason

so uncle/aunt so&so offers to take the kid for an evening and you have to say "no"

otherwise you'll be beating someone to death with an axe handle some night

SimpleSimon
01-08-2004, 08:07 PM
Reed won't be allowed to return to the halfway house or to go anywhere near the boy, Troiano said. And while some sexual offenders aren't allowed near children, Reed had no such prohibition, Troiano said. Reed has served two prison sentences for lewd and lascivious acts on children.

As a multiply convicted offender charged with another offense of the same character, I would hope he will not be allowed to return to the halfway house, or be allowed any contact with children. In fact, I hope he is charged as an habitual offender and, if convicted, given the maximum penalty possible - life.

What I want to know is why there was no stipulation on his parole certificate or in his parole instructions prohibiting contact with children, given the nature of his offense? His parole officer and that officer's supervisor are guilty of, at the least, dereliction in their duties. They are responsible to know his offenses, and to craft specific instructions to protect the public from the likelihood of his re-offending. They have all the power in that relationship and may issue any lawful order upon him they decide is needed - such a restriction is both lawful and needed.

Furthermore, the halfway house operators knew the nature of his conviction - such information must be specifically provided in the placement process - why did they have a child staying in the house? And why did the parole supervisor responsible for oversight of the operation of the halfway house to insure it's compliance with state law and parole board stipulations not act to prevent the child's presence?

The halfway house operators should be charged with felony child endangerment, the parole officers with misfeasance of a felony and dereliction of official duties.

MuffyTheVampyreLayer
01-08-2004, 10:37 PM
Pity he didn't hit him with the sharp end of the axe.

Uberwonder
01-09-2004, 03:06 AM
SS, you go gurl.