View Full Version : humuna humuna humuna
Billyman
10-08-2003, 12:56 AM
http://togawp.typepad.com/main/Images/britney.jpg
Every year she seems to reveal a little bit more of herself whether it be skin or brain (I didn’t say smarts). I see a pictorial in playboy in her future. I’m happy to be a subscriber now and I’ll be happy then. :D
I'm gonna give my boi Hef a call to see what we can arrange.
SatansLeftHand
10-08-2003, 03:17 AM
there isn't any of her body left to show. kazaa for videos.
Kayla
10-08-2003, 03:59 AM
shes not all that special
i love the pinup look she has going on but its so airbrushed
Billyman
10-08-2003, 04:17 AM
They're fakes SLH.
And they don't have to airbrush anymore! Behold, the era of computar software!
And still....
Who gives a fuck? That pic is sweet.
oh boy
the highest paid titty dancer in the world
riding to stardom on the backs of 14 year old girls...
with a world full of beautiful women (many of whom make their living getting their picture taken) I think I'll skip being impressed by her
but you can have a free dance on me,
the pics came from esquire's web site and like the gif animating program, were free
http://www.cox-internet.com/meshboy/images/danceho.gif
Cruise Director
10-08-2003, 07:42 AM
I love her. And I'm not afraid to admit it. Not that "stalking" kind of love but, you know, if she bought me a few drinks in a bar one night she might get lucky.
baccaruda
10-09-2003, 09:13 AM
i'd shag her rotten and call her christina.
Barbie
10-13-2003, 07:39 PM
Originally posted by MAC
http://www.cox-internet.com/meshboy/images/danceho.gif
Britney says sexy photos meant ‘to inspire’ the kids but boosting sales real inspiration (http://www.msnbc.com/news/978360.asp?0dm=V1CWL)
ADDRESSING INTERVIEWER Chuck Klosterman’s fair question as to whether her new album might be aimed at a more “mature” (read: sexually self-aware) audience, Spears claims to have outright refused such intimations from her record label. In her own words: “I was like, ‘Look, if you want me to be some kind of sex thing, that’s not me.’ I will never do that.” Elsewhere, Klosterman prods the pop icon for a reason why half-naked women are so perennially featured on magazine covers. For the record, her own carefully chosen belief is that such conspicuous displays of flesh are intended “to inspire people.”
If she’s inadvertently mixing up the definitions of “inspire” and “titillate,” or if she’s somehow got the term “sex thing” confused with “structural engineer,” then maybe I could believe that we’re dealing in the same mother tongue. But the more I read and ponder the interview (Klosterman, for his part, sounds just as incredulous), the more I’m convinced that Britney’s backstage tutors missed a few important vocabulary units.
To be clear: There’s nothing inherently amoral or scandalous about manifesting your sexuality for a mass audience, especially when your job is to entertain. Still, Britney appears content to corroborate the translucent myth that her success owes everything to her artistry, as if her so-so voice and serviceable dance-pop oeuvre could ever thrive without the prurient underpinnings. For someone so deeply enamored with Madonna, she’s abnormally reluctant to talk straight about the carnal corollaries of pop stardom and the legitimate benefits of a positive sexual identity (especially after finally and officially outing herself as a non-virgin earlier this year).
DOING IT FOR ‘THE KIDS’? RIGHT.
It must take a team of round-the-clock master manipulators and/or yea-sayers to shield Britney altogether from the rudimentary fact that she’s the biggest and most ubiquitous pop pin-up this side of Cindy Crawford. Alternately, it could be that she’s done a preternatural job of insulating herself from the reality in which “the kids” whom she purports to be so concerned about live each day. That she would regard her various cheesecake sessions as a way to of stir “inspiration” among her peers seems as preposterous as Snoop and Dre smoking weed for strictly medical reasons.
To repeatedly strip down to your skivvies while denying any sort of sexual self-perception (dismissing amorous onlookers as “pervs” to boot) is sad at best and insulting at worst. Maybe she and Madonna should be swapping conventional wisdom along with their spit. Better yet, maybe the media ought to stick to reviewing Britney’s CDs and performances and leave the improbable, mind-numbing doublespeak to the White House mouthpieces down in D.C.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
At least Christina know's why and for whom she's teasing.
Billyman
10-14-2003, 04:50 AM
I don't care.
As long as I get to see them naked. :p
vBulletin v3.5.3, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.