PDA

View Full Version : Iraq accepts the resolution


zim
11-14-2002, 03:08 AM
"without conditions"



http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/2465463.stm

Iraq says it has accepted the terms of the new UN Security Council resolution calling on the country to disarm - a move that apparently clears the way for the return of weapons inspectors.

Iraq's UN ambassador, Mohammed al-Douri, said he had delivered a letter to the UN Secretary General's office accepting the resolution "without conditions", but insisting that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction.

"The letter says that Iraq will deal with Security Council resolution 1441 despite its bad contents," Mr al-Douri said.

The US Secretary of State, Colin Powell, told the BBC that Iraq had no choice but to comply.

But he also warned that Iraq must completely comply with the UN weapons inspectors.

"I think Iraq will be making a very great mistake if they think there are fissures in the Security Council of the kind they have exploited in the past," Mr Powell said.

"This time every nation is saying the same thing - co-operate, comply and disarm," he said. "It will be disarmed one way or another."

Britain gave a cautious welcome to the Iraqi announcement, but said Baghdad now had to provide the world with full details of any prohibited arms programmes.

"Iraq has now taken the first step. I welcome that," said Foreign Secretary Jack Straw in a statement.

"But we must remain vigilant. Iraq's intentions are notoriously changeable."

The move appeared to clear the way for UN inspectors to return to Iraq on Monday after a four-year absence, backed by threats of military action from the United States and Britain.

"We are prepared to receive the inspectors within the assigned timetable," Mr al-Douri said.

"We are eager to see them perform their duties in accordance with international law as soon as possible."

Iraq had been given until Friday to accept the new UN resolution on disarmament or face "serious consequences".

On Tuesday, Iraq's parliament unanimously rejected the new resolution - although it left the final decision in the hands of Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein.

'Lies and manipulations'

Wednesday's letter, which runs to nearly nine pages, is signed by the Iraqi Foreign Minister, Naji Sabri.

According to an unofficial translation obtained by Reuters, the letter denies that Baghdad has any weapons of mass destruction "whether nuclear, chemical or biological as claimed by evil people."

"The lies and manipulations of the American administration and the British Government will be exposed, while the world will see how truthful and adequate the Iraqis are in what they say and do."

The 15-member UN Security Council unanimously approved the new resolution on Iraq last Friday, after weeks of wrangling among its members. Even Syria voted in favour.

Iraq's apparent acceptance of the resolution's terms came after President George W Bush renewed his warning that the US would take military action to disarm Iraq if it refused to comply.

Mr Bush said on Tuesday that the time for negotiations was over and he repeated that if Saddam Hussein did not act, the US would.

"There's no more time," he said. "There is a zero tolerance policy now. The last 11 years have been a period of time when this guy [Saddam Hussein] tried to deceive the world and we're through with it."

The inspections team, to be headed by the chief UN weapons inspector, Hans Blix, was expected to head for Iraq on Monday.

New rules

The new UN resolution lays out firm ground rules for inspections, allowing inspectors to look for evidence of chemical, biological or nuclear weapons programmes anywhere and at any time - including in Saddam Hussein's presidential palaces.

Iraqi state television broke into regular programming to announce the decision.

Our correspondent says that despite the leadership's very serious reservations about the resolution, Baghdad knew it had no choice, as it faced a military confrontation with the world's only superpower.

Billyman
11-14-2002, 04:28 AM
/me runs and hides a bag of ahthrax underneath a rock.

They'll never find it here. hehehehe.

*put's on sweet little innocent face on*

Pianomahnn
11-14-2002, 04:48 AM
Originally posted by Billyman
/me runs and hides a bag of ahthrax underneath a rock.

They'll never find it here. hehehehe.

*put's on sweet little innocent face on*

Damnit, Billy, you're giving Saddam ideas!!!

gone away
11-14-2002, 05:05 AM
Originally posted by Pianomahnn
Damnit, Billy, you're giving Saddam ideas!!!

yeh.. and that's unamerican :rolleyes:

D_I
11-14-2002, 05:24 AM
I think this is excellent news and boy, wasnt it strange that the UN vote and Baghdad accepting the resolution came so quickly after US elections gave the Republicans control (not absolute) of the Congress? Seems to me that more than a few countries heard the message quite clear. The US for the time being, doesent have a (so) divided goverment. The President can push through his agenda. That told Iraq we were deadly serious about war. It also told France, Russia and China. With the added emphasis of inspections on demand of anything at all and added threat of a military responce if interfered with, I see Iraq going the way of Libya and Cuba. Boxed in, little, impotent regimes that threaten no one outside their borders. I have no problem with that.

Deadpool
11-14-2002, 06:11 AM
Wow thats cool. Iraq had what?......almost a decade of stalling.
Way to go UN. You truly are the epitome of global policy enforcement.

zim
11-14-2002, 12:08 PM
watchin cnn now, seems people're questioning the wording of the "acceptance" letter from sadaam to the un.

seems the wording was more like


"we'll deal with the un resolution despite its bad contents"


than

common over, you've got the keys to the palace gates.


or maybe there're just people lookin fer an excuse to have war.

MAC
11-14-2002, 02:40 PM
pretend for a minute you are saddam huseinne

----------------------------

Dear Iraq,
Disarm and let us have free access to your entire country to PROVE that you have disarmed. We don't think you can be trusted and thusly you shouldn't have the trust of your ppl. The things you believe are wrong. The things we believe are right. You should be more like us and suck our dicks.
Sincerely,
The richer more powerful nations of the world who are sucking one particular nation's dick.

------------------------------

It doesn't matter how true it is.
The situation is the same: he is a bad guy who will aggressively attack peaceful nations to take what they have

(at least thats what I have heard my whole life...personally I believe it)