zim
11-12-2002, 12:48 PM
Is it the governments job to enact laws to promote social change?
Was justwatching CNN, and some womens group has aparently realized that there is a golf club somewhere in america to which many corporate executives are members. They have a policy of not accepting women, and as a result this womens group is crying foul and discrimination.
My understanding of the clubs response is "we know we're discriminating against women, we're a private club, and have a right to discriminate."
Sounds similar to the boy scouts anti-homosexual policy.
Is it the governments job to enact laws to make this illegal? Or is it the peoples job to promote social change.
The womens group says its wrong for corporate ceo's to discriminate against half of their customers. If you want to look at it that way, fine. It is wrong. Certainly sounds heinous and wrong to me. But whose job is it to fix it? The customers who are being discriminated could have an old fasioned boycott and enact social change through pressure... or they could have their lawmakers do it.
Which is the way that this should be done. Should the government be involved, or should the people do something about it?
Was justwatching CNN, and some womens group has aparently realized that there is a golf club somewhere in america to which many corporate executives are members. They have a policy of not accepting women, and as a result this womens group is crying foul and discrimination.
My understanding of the clubs response is "we know we're discriminating against women, we're a private club, and have a right to discriminate."
Sounds similar to the boy scouts anti-homosexual policy.
Is it the governments job to enact laws to make this illegal? Or is it the peoples job to promote social change.
The womens group says its wrong for corporate ceo's to discriminate against half of their customers. If you want to look at it that way, fine. It is wrong. Certainly sounds heinous and wrong to me. But whose job is it to fix it? The customers who are being discriminated could have an old fasioned boycott and enact social change through pressure... or they could have their lawmakers do it.
Which is the way that this should be done. Should the government be involved, or should the people do something about it?