PDA

View Full Version : Only in America!


SimpleSimon
06-01-2002, 01:18 AM
For those who don't know, the Stella Awards rank up there with the Darwin awards. In 1994, a New Mexico jury awarded $2.9 million U.S. in damages to 81 year old Stella Liebeck who suffered third degree burns to her legs, groin and buttocks after spilling a cup of McDonald's coffee on herself.

This is the case that inspired the annual "Stella Award" for the most frivolous lawsuit in the U.S. The cases listed below are clear candidates for the award and prove that, with the right attorney, you can win anything!

1. January 2000: Kathleen Robertson of Austin Texas was awarded $780,000 by a jury after breaking her ankle tripping over a toddler who was running inside furniture store. The owners of the store were understandably surprised at the verdict, considering the misbehaving little tyke was Ms. Robertson's son.

2. June 1998: A 19-year-old Carl Truman of Los Angeles won $74,000 and medical expenses when his neighbor ran over his hand with a Honda Accord. Mr. Truman apparently didn't notice there was someone at the wheel of the car, when he was trying to steal his neighbor's hubcaps.

3. October 1998: A Terrence Dickson of Bristol, Pennsylvania, was leaving a house he had just finished robbing by way of the garage. He was not able to get the garage door to go up since the automatic door opener was malfunctioning. He couldn't re-enter the house because the door connecting the house and garage locked when he pulled it shut. The family was on vacation.
Dickson found himself locked in the garage for eight days. He subsisted on a case of Pepsi he found, and a large bag of dry dog food. He sued the homeowner's insurance claiming the situation caused him undue mental anguish. The jury agreed to the tune of half a million dollars.

4. October 1999: Jerry Williams of Little Rock, Arkansas, was awarded $14,500 and medical expenses after being bitten on the buttocks by his next door neighbor's beagle. The beagle was on a chain in it's owner's fenced in yard.
The award was less than sought because the jury felt the dog might have been just a little provoked at the time by Williams -- who was shooting it repeatedly with a pellet gun.

5. May 2000: A Philadelphia restaurant was ordered to pay Amber Carson of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, $113,500 after she slipped on a soft drink and broke her coccyx. The beverage was on the floor because Ms. Carson threw it at her boyfriend 30 seconds earlier during an argument.

6. December 1997: Kara Walton of Claymont, Delaware, successfully sued the owner of a night club in a neighboring city when she fell from the bathroom window to the floor and knocked out her two front teeth. This occurred while Ms Walton was trying to sneak through the window in the ladies room to avoid paying the $3.50 cover charge. She was awarded $12,000 and dental expenses.

And the front-runner is:

7. November 2000: Mr. Merv Grazinski, of Oklahoma City. In November 2000 Grazinski purchased a brand new 32 foot Winnebago motor home. On his first trip home, having joined the freeway, he set the cruise control at 70 mph and calmly left the drivers seat to go into the back and make himself a cup of coffee. Not surprisingly the Winnie left the freeway, crashed and overturned.

Grazinski sued Winnebago for not advising him in the handbook that he couldn't actually do this. He was awarded $1,750,000 plus a new Winnie.

Winniebago actually changed their handbooks on the back of this court case, just in case there are any other complete morons buying their vehicles.

Torque
06-01-2002, 01:41 AM
Dont Believe Everything you Read (http://www.snopes2.com/legal/lawsuits.htm)

SimpleSimon
06-01-2002, 01:12 PM
Originally posted by Torque
Dont Believe Everything you Read (http://www.snopes2.com/legal/lawsuits.htm)

Good shot, Torque.

Billyman
06-01-2002, 01:37 PM
Thanks Torque, but there are lots of that kind of shit going on though. I blame the judicial system. It sucks.

Pianomahnn
06-01-2002, 03:26 PM
Originally posted by Billyman
Thanks Torque, but there are lots of that kind of shit going on though. I blame the judicial system. It sucks.

I don't know if we can blame the judicial system.

(know that I am dumb when it comes to courts and stuff)

Are there are not juries present during these things? I thought they decided things. Shouldn't they be the ones to blame?

Pianomahnn
06-01-2002, 05:25 PM
This came from fitness forum I frequent

http://www.nwaonline.net/275191565639815.bsp


pathetic to say the least

Cruise Director
06-01-2002, 06:01 PM
There are similar cases to those out there. Although the plaintiffs more than likely get their cases dismissed, it ties up the legal system for months and years and costs people and businesses millions of dollars to defend. You would be amazed at some of the lawsuits and claims that get made against my company. People are just sue happy. If you don't believe me, turn on your T.V. Every other commercial is some jackass lawyer telling you how to sue for car wrecks, phen-fen or on the job injury. This doesn't affect you, right? Call your insurance agent and talk with them for a few moments about the affect of these ambulance chasers on your monthly premium.

fujimo
06-01-2002, 07:31 PM
there is a two way street there too.

A close friend was involved in a wreck a couple of weeks ago. It was the other parties fault and she admitted it.

This was the only vehicle he had. An old Ford 68 P/U. No insurance company is even trying to help him get his vehicle back on the road.

He would often go a few job sites and do welding jobs. Now he can not go anywhere and the insurance company is dicking him around.

If an insurance company would take care of some one and make a fair offer, many people would prefer not pay 30% to an attorney.

I am preparing a demand letter to the insurance company today.
My next step is to file a complaint with the Department of insurance too. I'll help him get results.

The greatest thing about our judicial system is that anyone can bring a complaint against a person at any time and have some sort of hearing.

The judge must decide if the case is frivilous. This is a lot better than some dumb ass clerk trying to make that decision.

I would like to see other parties have to my attorney if thier crap was a dealy tactic or they filed frivilous motions to jack upo the bill.

Billyman
06-02-2002, 12:46 PM
Originally posted by Cruise Director
People are just sue happy. If you don't believe me, turn on your T.V. Every other commercial is some jackass lawyer telling you how to sue for car wrecks, phen-fen or on the job injury.

You are just so correct my friend, but who's to blame for this "sue happy" mentality?

I blame the courts and the judicial system for letting it happen. If they would put their foot down and throw out the nonsence when it's all clearly nonsence, it would deter people from being "sue happy". As it stands now, you can get away with murder (ask OJ). The whole judicial system blows.

Oh lookit, I think I'm wearing in a blister on the tip of my pointer finger from typing so much. Hmmmm, there's no warning tag on my keyboard! I think I'll sue! :rolleyes:

Weird thing is, if I persued it, I could probably win.

rage
06-02-2002, 07:07 PM
Originally posted by Billyman


You are just so correct my friend, but who's to blame for this "sue happy" mentality?

I blame the courts and the judicial system for letting it happen. If they would put their foot down and throw out the nonsence when it's all clearly nonsence, it would deter people from being "sue happy". As it stands now, you can get away with murder (ask OJ). The whole judicial system blows.

Oh lookit, I think I'm wearing in a blister on the tip of my pointer finger from typing so much. Hmmmm, there's no warning tag on my keyboard! I think I'll sue! :rolleyes:

Weird thing is, if I persued it, I could probably win.

I think these things are the exception rather than the norm though. Sure, the justice system isn't perfect, but nothing can be. We can aspire to perfection, but we can never truly reach it. Definitely some things need improvement, but I think you have really blown the problems out of proportions.

For example of frivilous lawsuits that aren't so frivilous after all, go <a href="http://www.atlanet.org/cjfacts/other/mcdonald.ht">here</a> for an example with the McDonalds thing. (thx to the the original link torque).

There are definitely other things that need to be worked out though. Like the death penalty. Now, I am not against the death penalty, but rather innocent people getting put to death. Many of the people on death row are those who can't afford a good lawyer. Do the people who have money get sent to death row? Most likely not, if they get imprisoned, they still get their life. Lots of cases have shown people on death row who are in fact innocent, or have not had fair trials.

As far as you getting a blister on your finger, I doubt you would really win ;), in addition, I would bet you were laughed at by most any lawyer you spoke with, and if you did find one, I imagine the judge would laugh you out of court. :D

fujimo
06-03-2002, 12:44 AM
but if he had a blister on his fingers and he was a concert pianist, and the blister was casued by a pair of gloves that a sales man said would "FIT".......now he might have a case.

Billyman
06-03-2002, 04:07 AM
Originally posted by rage


As far as you getting a blister on your finger, I doubt you would really win ;), in addition, I would bet you were laughed at by most any lawyer you spoke with, and if you did find one, I imagine the judge would laugh you out of court. :D

Wanna bet? That does it, I'm pursuing it, just to prove you wrong! :p

Kidding

However, it really is no different from the stupid shit I read in the news paper on a daily basis. Hmmm, maybe I should pursue it. Where's Johnny when you need him? :D

rage
06-03-2002, 02:05 PM
Originally posted by Billyman


Wanna bet? That does it, I'm pursuing it, just to prove you wrong! :p

Kidding

However, it really is no different from the stupid shit I read in the news paper on a daily basis. Hmmm, maybe I should pursue it. Where's Johnny when you need him? :D

well...make sure you play the race card!

TotalAnarchy
06-03-2002, 02:13 PM
You see, in Australia, if you put up useless cases, the judges are likely to make you pay the defendants costs as well as throwing your case out. Makes you think twice, I bet.